<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 541 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It affirmed that the transaction was genuine, rental income should be treated as business income, and interest/processing charges were allowable business expenses. The Tribunal also found no evidence supporting the Benami transaction claim. Citing Supreme Court decisions, it concluded in favor of the assessee on all contested issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2022 13:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 541 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It affirmed that the transaction was genuine, rental income should be treated as business income, and interest/processing charges were allowable business expenses. The Tribunal also found no evidence supporting the Benami transaction claim. Citing Supreme Court decisions, it concluded in favor of the assessee on all contested issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>