<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 521 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431404</link>
    <description>The court found the dismissal of the petitioner from service for obtaining illegal gratification disproportionate to the offense compared to his colleagues involved in the same incident. As a result, the court reduced the punishment to a two-year increment cut with cumulative effect. The petitioner was directed to rejoin duty within four weeks with salary entitlement but was barred from claiming arrears of past salary or other monetary benefits due to the dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:25:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 521 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431404</link>
      <description>The court found the dismissal of the petitioner from service for obtaining illegal gratification disproportionate to the offense compared to his colleagues involved in the same incident. As a result, the court reduced the punishment to a two-year increment cut with cumulative effect. The petitioner was directed to rejoin duty within four weeks with salary entitlement but was barred from claiming arrears of past salary or other monetary benefits due to the dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>