<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 219 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31190</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the nature of expenses on publicity, advertisement, and glow sign boards, allowing them as revenue expenditures. Additionally, the court upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under Section 80 I of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite the Revenue&#039;s objections. Consequently, all substantial questions of law were decided against the Revenue, leading to the dismissal of multiple Income Tax Appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 219 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31190</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the nature of expenses on publicity, advertisement, and glow sign boards, allowing them as revenue expenditures. Additionally, the court upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under Section 80 I of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite the Revenue&#039;s objections. Consequently, all substantial questions of law were decided against the Revenue, leading to the dismissal of multiple Income Tax Appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>