<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 904 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305564</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s findings that there was insufficient evidence against Anil and Ramesh Bachani. It also concluded that the distinction made between Raju and Lalit Jain was unjustified. The plea for confiscation of the ship was rejected due to a lack of supporting evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:54:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 904 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305564</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s findings that there was insufficient evidence against Anil and Ramesh Bachani. It also concluded that the distinction made between Raju and Lalit Jain was unjustified. The plea for confiscation of the ship was rejected due to a lack of supporting evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>