<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 325 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31186</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to partially allow the appeal of a brick manufacturing and selling business regarding discrepancies in unrecorded sales. The gross profit rate was reduced from 14% to 10%, resulting in an addition of Rs. 144000 for disclosed sales. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s decision reasonable, considering past history and subsequent years&#039; rates. The ITAT&#039;s restriction of unexplained investment to Rs. 5000 was also upheld. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that the ITAT&#039;s decision was based on factual findings and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 325 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31186</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to partially allow the appeal of a brick manufacturing and selling business regarding discrepancies in unrecorded sales. The gross profit rate was reduced from 14% to 10%, resulting in an addition of Rs. 144000 for disclosed sales. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s decision reasonable, considering past history and subsequent years&#039; rates. The ITAT&#039;s restriction of unexplained investment to Rs. 5000 was also upheld. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that the ITAT&#039;s decision was based on factual findings and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>