<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 520 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431403</link>
    <description>A challenge to customs duty computation and the principle of zeroing was taken up for notice, and interim protection was granted. The impugned order was stayed on condition that the challenger deposit Rs. 80 crores within sixty days, with any earlier or part deposit to be given due credit. The order therefore preserves the dispute on duty computation while making the stay conditional on compliance with the deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 520 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431403</link>
      <description>A challenge to customs duty computation and the principle of zeroing was taken up for notice, and interim protection was granted. The impugned order was stayed on condition that the challenger deposit Rs. 80 crores within sixty days, with any earlier or part deposit to be given due credit. The order therefore preserves the dispute on duty computation while making the stay conditional on compliance with the deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>