https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431402 Applicants accused under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were granted regular bail because the investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, charges had not been framed, and they had remained in custody for about 23 months. The Court noted that the alleged offence carried a maximum punishment of five years with no prescribed minimum sentence, and held that continued detention pending trial was unjustified without examining the merits of the ations. Regular bail was therefore granted. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431402 Applicants accused under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were granted regular bail because the investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, charges had not been framed, and they had remained in custody for about 23 months. The Court noted that the alleged offence carried a maximum punishment of five years with no prescribed minimum sentence, and held that continued detention pending trial was unjustified without examining the merits of the ations. Regular bail was therefore granted. Case-Laws GST Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431402