<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 513 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431396</link>
    <description>Advance ruling jurisdiction is confined to questions relating to supplies of goods or services being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken. Where consideration had already been received and the relevant service transaction was completed before filing, the matter was treated as a past and completed supply. On that basis, the statutory precondition for an advance ruling was not met, and the application was rejected as not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 513 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431396</link>
      <description>Advance ruling jurisdiction is confined to questions relating to supplies of goods or services being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken. Where consideration had already been received and the relevant service transaction was completed before filing, the matter was treated as a past and completed supply. On that basis, the statutory precondition for an advance ruling was not met, and the application was rejected as not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>