<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 510 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431393</link>
    <description>AAR Maharashtra ruled that Tata Ace Garbage Tipper vehicles designed for municipal waste collection under Swachh Bharat Mission fall under tariff heading 8704 (motor vehicles for transport of goods) rather than 8705 (special purpose vehicles). Despite specialized features like 60:40/70:30 waste segregation partition, tarpaulin covers, and hydraulic tipping equipment for NGT compliance, the vehicles are classified as goods carriers per registration certificate. The ruling applies 28% GST rate under Schedule IV, rejecting the applicant&#039;s claim for special purpose vehicle classification which would have attracted different tax treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 510 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431393</link>
      <description>AAR Maharashtra ruled that Tata Ace Garbage Tipper vehicles designed for municipal waste collection under Swachh Bharat Mission fall under tariff heading 8704 (motor vehicles for transport of goods) rather than 8705 (special purpose vehicles). Despite specialized features like 60:40/70:30 waste segregation partition, tarpaulin covers, and hydraulic tipping equipment for NGT compliance, the vehicles are classified as goods carriers per registration certificate. The ruling applies 28% GST rate under Schedule IV, rejecting the applicant&#039;s claim for special purpose vehicle classification which would have attracted different tax treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>