<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 495 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment reopening under section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on incriminating evidence. However, it directed the deletion of the Rs. 3.85 lakh addition to the assessee&#039;s income for a flat purchase due to lack of opportunity for cross-examination, partly allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 06:09:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 495 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment reopening under section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on incriminating evidence. However, it directed the deletion of the Rs. 3.85 lakh addition to the assessee&#039;s income for a flat purchase due to lack of opportunity for cross-examination, partly allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>