<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 488 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431371</link>
    <description>Where an accused on bail absconds and non-bailable warrants remain unexecuted, the proper course under the Code is to invoke the proclamation procedure for an absconding or concealing person. The trial court was not justified in dropping proceedings merely because the warrants were not served through the extradition channel. The Delhi HC therefore set aside the order terminating the case and required the trial court to proceed further in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 06:09:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 488 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431371</link>
      <description>Where an accused on bail absconds and non-bailable warrants remain unexecuted, the proper course under the Code is to invoke the proclamation procedure for an absconding or concealing person. The trial court was not justified in dropping proceedings merely because the warrants were not served through the extradition channel. The Delhi HC therefore set aside the order terminating the case and required the trial court to proceed further in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>