https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431362 The court refrained from quashing the order mandating physical filing before the NCLAT, emphasizing the trend of e-filing. It highlighted the importance of timely filing under the IBC, particularly regarding the interpretation of the time period for filing appeals. The NCLAT's order on physical filing date impact on limitation computation was noted, stressing adherence to rules. Concerns about appeal dismissal due to late physical filing were acknowledged, with the court deferring to the NCLAT's jurisdiction for resolution and recognizing the shift towards e-filing in legal proceedings. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Dec 2022 05:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431362 The court refrained from quashing the order mandating physical filing before the NCLAT, emphasizing the trend of e-filing. It highlighted the importance of timely filing under the IBC, particularly regarding the interpretation of the time period for filing appeals. The NCLAT's order on physical filing date impact on limitation computation was noted, stressing adherence to rules. Concerns about appeal dismissal due to late physical filing were acknowledged, with the court deferring to the NCLAT's jurisdiction for resolution and recognizing the shift towards e-filing in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 05 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431362