<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 474 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431357</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in , as no good ground to interfere with the impugned order was found. Delay was condoned, and pending applications were disposed of. Petitioner was represented by Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR, Mr. Shyam Gopal, Adv., Mr. Manish, Adv., Mr. Shantnu Sharma, Adv., Mr. Digvijay Dam, Adv., while the respondent was represented by Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv., Mr. Kishore Kunal, AOR, Mr. Manish Rastogi, Adv., Ms. Ankita Prakash, Adv.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 06:08:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 474 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431357</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in , as no good ground to interfere with the impugned order was found. Delay was condoned, and pending applications were disposed of. Petitioner was represented by Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR, Mr. Shyam Gopal, Adv., Mr. Manish, Adv., Mr. Shantnu Sharma, Adv., Mr. Digvijay Dam, Adv., while the respondent was represented by Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv., Mr. Kishore Kunal, AOR, Mr. Manish Rastogi, Adv., Ms. Ankita Prakash, Adv.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>