<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 473 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431356</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner to make a reduced pre-deposit of Rs. 50,00,000 within two weeks due to financial hardships. The appeal on service tax liability for the period December 2011 to February 2015 was allowed to be heard by CESTAT after compliance, aiming to balance pre-deposit requirements with financial constraints for access to justice and upholding service tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 06:08:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 473 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431356</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner to make a reduced pre-deposit of Rs. 50,00,000 within two weeks due to financial hardships. The appeal on service tax liability for the period December 2011 to February 2015 was allowed to be heard by CESTAT after compliance, aiming to balance pre-deposit requirements with financial constraints for access to justice and upholding service tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>