<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431352</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that SGIPL provided telecommunication services to SingTel on its own account, not as an intermediary. The Commissioner (Appeals) correctly held that SGIPL&#039;s services qualified as export of services, entitling SGIPL to the refund claims. The department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431352</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that SGIPL provided telecommunication services to SingTel on its own account, not as an intermediary. The Commissioner (Appeals) correctly held that SGIPL&#039;s services qualified as export of services, entitling SGIPL to the refund claims. The department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>