https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305551 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging an order under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as it found no pre-existing dispute over the supply or quality of goods raised by the Corporate Debtor before the demand notice. The Tribunal declined to address the criminal case against the Managing Director, emphasizing its pending consideration before a competent court. The decision highlights the necessity of establishing pre-existing disputes in insolvency proceedings and the Tribunal's limitations in adjudicating matters under criminal law pending before other competent authorities. en-us Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:54:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305551 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging an order under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as it found no pre-existing dispute over the supply or quality of goods raised by the Corporate Debtor before the demand notice. The Tribunal declined to address the criminal case against the Managing Director, emphasizing its pending consideration before a competent court. The decision highlights the necessity of establishing pre-existing disputes in insolvency proceedings and the Tribunal's limitations in adjudicating matters under criminal law pending before other competent authorities. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305551