<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>MERE POSSESSION OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION NOT ENOUGH FOR INSIDER TRADING – ACTUAL PROFIT MOTIVE ESSENTIAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10861</link>
    <description>Regulation 3 prohibits insiders from dealing in securities or communicating unpublished price sensitive information while in possession of it; establishing a violation requires proof that the person was an insider with access to UPSI that was price sensitive and that the person traded or communicated the information. Materiality of price impact must be assessed by the realistic potential to affect market price, and liability also depends on the insider&#039;s purpose-transactions made under compelling financial necessity may not constitute insider trading despite possession of UPSI.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2022 13:51:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2022 13:51:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>MERE POSSESSION OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION NOT ENOUGH FOR INSIDER TRADING – ACTUAL PROFIT MOTIVE ESSENTIAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10861</link>
      <description>Regulation 3 prohibits insiders from dealing in securities or communicating unpublished price sensitive information while in possession of it; establishing a violation requires proof that the person was an insider with access to UPSI that was price sensitive and that the person traded or communicated the information. Materiality of price impact must be assessed by the realistic potential to affect market price, and liability also depends on the insider&#039;s purpose-transactions made under compelling financial necessity may not constitute insider trading despite possession of UPSI.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2022 13:51:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>