https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305550 The court dismissed the application for review, ruling that the company's name change did not equate to a property transfer, thus upholding the original order for mutation in favor of the writ petitioner. The contempt application was adjourned for four weeks, granting the contemnors additional time to comply with the court's December 3, 1998, order. The court emphasized that the respondents' failure to comply was not bona fide and warned of potential actions if compliance was not achieved within the given timeframe. en-us Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 10 Dec 2023 19:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305550 The court dismissed the application for review, ruling that the company's name change did not equate to a property transfer, thus upholding the original order for mutation in favor of the writ petitioner. The contempt application was adjourned for four weeks, granting the contemnors additional time to comply with the court's December 3, 1998, order. The court emphasized that the respondents' failure to comply was not bona fide and warned of potential actions if compliance was not achieved within the given timeframe. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305550