<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1383 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305549</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the assessment order under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08. The court found that the petitioner was not provided with a fair opportunity to respond to allegations based on a third party&#039;s statement, leading to the assessment being deemed unsustainable. The court quashed the order and directed a fresh consideration by the respondent, emphasizing the importance of affording the petitioner a fair and reasonable opportunity for a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1383 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305549</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the assessment order under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08. The court found that the petitioner was not provided with a fair opportunity to respond to allegations based on a third party&#039;s statement, leading to the assessment being deemed unsustainable. The court quashed the order and directed a fresh consideration by the respondent, emphasizing the importance of affording the petitioner a fair and reasonable opportunity for a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>