<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 458 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the subsidy received by the assessee should be treated as a capital receipt, not a revenue receipt, based on judicial precedents. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to exclude the subsidy from taxable income and provide necessary relief to the assessee. The decision emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s authority to entertain additional claims through a rectification petition. The judgment was pronounced in Kolkata on 22nd November 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 458 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the subsidy received by the assessee should be treated as a capital receipt, not a revenue receipt, based on judicial precedents. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to exclude the subsidy from taxable income and provide necessary relief to the assessee. The decision emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s authority to entertain additional claims through a rectification petition. The judgment was pronounced in Kolkata on 22nd November 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>