<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 452 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431335</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order and entitling the appellants to consequential benefits. The judgment emphasized the lack of reliable evidence, the violation of principles of natural justice, and the failure of the Revenue to substantiate its allegations with concrete proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2022 11:14:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 452 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431335</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order and entitling the appellants to consequential benefits. The judgment emphasized the lack of reliable evidence, the violation of principles of natural justice, and the failure of the Revenue to substantiate its allegations with concrete proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>