<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 435 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431318</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the PCIT&#039;s revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the PCIT exceeded its jurisdiction by revising an order not related to the buy-back issue and that the revision was time-barred. Additionally, it was determined that section 115QA did not apply to the case. The ITAT emphasized that rectification orders are not meant for reassessment on debatable issues, leading to the appeal&#039;s success.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2022 11:14:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 435 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431318</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the PCIT&#039;s revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the PCIT exceeded its jurisdiction by revising an order not related to the buy-back issue and that the revision was time-barred. Additionally, it was determined that section 115QA did not apply to the case. The ITAT emphasized that rectification orders are not meant for reassessment on debatable issues, leading to the appeal&#039;s success.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>