<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 432 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431315</link>
    <description>An assessment accepting a foreign exchange fluctuation loss claim without inquiry or verification was treated as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue because the Assessing Officer had not examined its allowability under section 43AA, despite the revised return and explanation being on record. The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld revision under section 263, finding that failure to scrutinise a material claim justified revisional interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 432 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431315</link>
      <description>An assessment accepting a foreign exchange fluctuation loss claim without inquiry or verification was treated as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue because the Assessing Officer had not examined its allowability under section 43AA, despite the revised return and explanation being on record. The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld revision under section 263, finding that failure to scrutinise a material claim justified revisional interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>