<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 424 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the transfer pricing issue back to the Transfer Pricing Officer for re-examination. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, reinstating the disallowance of the provision for warranty expenses. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing substantial evidence to support claims for deductions and adjustments in line with legal and accounting principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 424 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the transfer pricing issue back to the Transfer Pricing Officer for re-examination. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, reinstating the disallowance of the provision for warranty expenses. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing substantial evidence to support claims for deductions and adjustments in line with legal and accounting principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>