https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305525 The respondent agreed to relieve the petitioner of a six-month imprisonment sentence. The petitioner's counsel committed to paying the fine. The court considered the exercise of extraordinary power under Article 226 and Section 482 of the Cr.P.C for compounding the offense, noting limitations. The petitioner, a 60-year-old woman, had her sentence suspended by the Vadodara Sessions Judge, which was extended due to circumstances. en-us Fri, 26 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Dec 2022 13:20:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305525 The respondent agreed to relieve the petitioner of a six-month imprisonment sentence. The petitioner's counsel committed to paying the fine. The court considered the exercise of extraordinary power under Article 226 and Section 482 of the Cr.P.C for compounding the offense, noting limitations. The petitioner, a 60-year-old woman, had her sentence suspended by the Vadodara Sessions Judge, which was extended due to circumstances. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305525