<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 680 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305525</link>
    <description>Interim suspension of sentence was extended because the existing protection was due to expire before the matter could be heard again. The HC considered it appropriate to preserve the petitioner&#039;s interim relief for a limited further period pending consideration of the petition, and the suspension of sentence was continued till the next date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 13:20:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 680 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305525</link>
      <description>Interim suspension of sentence was extended because the existing protection was due to expire before the matter could be heard again. The HC considered it appropriate to preserve the petitioner&#039;s interim relief for a limited further period pending consideration of the petition, and the suspension of sentence was continued till the next date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>