<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 404 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431287</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of reasons recorded by the AO and the requirement for failure to disclose material facts for reopening assessments after the prescribed period. The judgment highlighted the need for strict adherence to legal procedures and established principles in tax assessments to ensure fairness and compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 404 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431287</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of reasons recorded by the AO and the requirement for failure to disclose material facts for reopening assessments after the prescribed period. The judgment highlighted the need for strict adherence to legal procedures and established principles in tax assessments to ensure fairness and compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>