<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 394 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431277</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment of income, emphasizing that all relevant details were disclosed in the tax return. The tribunal also addressed the exclusion of the time period for filing the appeal during the COVID-19 pandemic and set aside the penalty imposed for the disallowance of capital expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 394 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431277</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment of income, emphasizing that all relevant details were disclosed in the tax return. The tribunal also addressed the exclusion of the time period for filing the appeal during the COVID-19 pandemic and set aside the penalty imposed for the disallowance of capital expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>