<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 391 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431274</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the disallowance of transfer of funds to sister concerns, upholding the net profit rate at 0.15%. The AO and CIT(A) disallowed expenses and applied a ratio against the income assessed at 0.15%, dismissing the appellant&#039;s claim for 50% of expenses. The Tribunal found no illegality in not allowing business expenses against estimated income and rejected the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding ITAT judgments. The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions on expenses without income incurrence and rejected the appellant&#039;s claims for re-agitation, ultimately dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 391 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431274</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the disallowance of transfer of funds to sister concerns, upholding the net profit rate at 0.15%. The AO and CIT(A) disallowed expenses and applied a ratio against the income assessed at 0.15%, dismissing the appellant&#039;s claim for 50% of expenses. The Tribunal found no illegality in not allowing business expenses against estimated income and rejected the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding ITAT judgments. The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions on expenses without income incurrence and rejected the appellant&#039;s claims for re-agitation, ultimately dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>