https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305514 Notices issued under the settlement scheme by an officer other than the designated authority were without jurisdiction because the statutory power to verify the application and determine the amount payable vested only in the authority appointed for the relevant area. Those notices were therefore set aside. A later rejection order passed while the writ petitions were pending and during subsistence of the court's stay could not stand; the respondents undertook to withdraw it, and the applications were directed to be reconsidered afresh by the proper designated authority under the scheme. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:00:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305514 Notices issued under the settlement scheme by an officer other than the designated authority were without jurisdiction because the statutory power to verify the application and determine the amount payable vested only in the authority appointed for the relevant area. Those notices were therefore set aside. A later rejection order passed while the writ petitions were pending and during subsistence of the court's stay could not stand; the respondents undertook to withdraw it, and the applications were directed to be reconsidered afresh by the proper designated authority under the scheme. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305514