https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431253 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the property ceased to be the Corporate Debtor's asset before the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiation, thus not protected under Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The decision highlights the significance of timing regarding lease termination and possession in relation to the applicability of the IBC's moratorium provisions. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Dec 2022 09:59:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431253 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the property ceased to be the Corporate Debtor's asset before the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiation, thus not protected under Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The decision highlights the significance of timing regarding lease termination and possession in relation to the applicability of the IBC's moratorium provisions. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431253