<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 367 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431250</link>
    <description>Where transmission of shares of a deceased shareholder is met by a substantiated rival claim and the succession certificate is itself under challenge, the tribunal may defer transmission until the competing claim is resolved. The record showed that the rival claimant asserted rights over the shares, held the original share certificates, and relied on a registered will to support the claim, while the appellant&#039;s succession certificate was pending challenge before the High Court. On those facts, directing notice to the rival claimant and postponing transmission was treated as a prudent and lawful course, with no illegality or infirmity in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 09:59:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 367 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431250</link>
      <description>Where transmission of shares of a deceased shareholder is met by a substantiated rival claim and the succession certificate is itself under challenge, the tribunal may defer transmission until the competing claim is resolved. The record showed that the rival claimant asserted rights over the shares, held the original share certificates, and relied on a registered will to support the claim, while the appellant&#039;s succession certificate was pending challenge before the High Court. On those facts, directing notice to the rival claimant and postponing transmission was treated as a prudent and lawful course, with no illegality or infirmity in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>