<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 364 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431247</link>
    <description>The appellant was held entitled to interest at 12% per annum from the date of deposit on the revenue deposit, as it was not duty or a pre-deposit. Additionally, the appellant was awarded interest as compensation at 6% from the date of the impugned Order-in-Appeal until disbursement, as the deposited amount did not appear to be duty or pre-deposit. Both issues were decided in favor of the appellant, resulting in the setting aside of the challenged order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 09:59:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 364 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431247</link>
      <description>The appellant was held entitled to interest at 12% per annum from the date of deposit on the revenue deposit, as it was not duty or a pre-deposit. Additionally, the appellant was awarded interest as compensation at 6% from the date of the impugned Order-in-Appeal until disbursement, as the deposited amount did not appear to be duty or pre-deposit. Both issues were decided in favor of the appellant, resulting in the setting aside of the challenged order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>