https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431246 The Commission dismissed the Consumer Complaint, ruling that the Complainant, despite alleging breach of contract and deficiency of service, was not considered a "Consumer" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Complaint was barred by limitation and deemed not maintainable due to the commercial nature of the transaction and the Complainant's investor status. The Opposite Parties' defense of no deficiency in service and external delays beyond their control was upheld, granting the Complainant the liberty to seek recourse through the appropriate forum. en-us Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431246 The Commission dismissed the Consumer Complaint, ruling that the Complainant, despite alleging breach of contract and deficiency of service, was not considered a "Consumer" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Complaint was barred by limitation and deemed not maintainable due to the commercial nature of the transaction and the Complainant's investor status. The Opposite Parties' defense of no deficiency in service and external delays beyond their control was upheld, granting the Complainant the liberty to seek recourse through the appropriate forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431246