https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305511 The appeal challenging the decree for possession under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure was dismissed. The court upheld the decree based on the appellant's clear admissions of the lease deed and rent payment. The service of notice of termination was deemed valid, supported by original postal receipts and acknowledgment. The appellant's attempt to dispute the landlord's title was barred by the Indian Evidence Act. The lease was forfeited under the Transfer of Property Act due to the appellant's actions, leading to eviction. The appellant was ordered to pay Rs. 2,00,000/- as costs for frivolous litigation. en-us Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2022 15:56:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305511 The appeal challenging the decree for possession under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure was dismissed. The court upheld the decree based on the appellant's clear admissions of the lease deed and rent payment. The service of notice of termination was deemed valid, supported by original postal receipts and acknowledgment. The appellant's attempt to dispute the landlord's title was barred by the Indian Evidence Act. The lease was forfeited under the Transfer of Property Act due to the appellant's actions, leading to eviction. The appellant was ordered to pay Rs. 2,00,000/- as costs for frivolous litigation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305511