<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 343 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31153</link>
    <description>The reference from the ITAT could not be answered because the Court lacked the relevant records. The matter had earlier been remanded by the Tribunal, but the post-remand status of the proceedings could not be ascertained on the available material. The reference was therefore returned to the Tribunal for want of records, without any substantive determination on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 343 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31153</link>
      <description>The reference from the ITAT could not be answered because the Court lacked the relevant records. The matter had earlier been remanded by the Tribunal, but the post-remand status of the proceedings could not be ascertained on the available material. The reference was therefore returned to the Tribunal for want of records, without any substantive determination on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>