<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 351 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, ruling that there was no violation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions by the Respondents. It held that the Adjudicating Authority lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application filed 18 months post-approval of the resolution plan. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 11:48:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 351 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, ruling that there was no violation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions by the Respondents. It held that the Adjudicating Authority lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application filed 18 months post-approval of the resolution plan. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>