<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 341 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31150</link>
    <description>Where a deemed Modvat credit notification required inputs to be received under invoices declaring payment of appropriate duty, the recipient was not burdened with proving actual duty discharge by the supplier unless the notification expressly imposed that requirement. The High Court followed its earlier view that receipt of inputs with the requisite invoice declaration satisfied the condition for credit, and a later allegation that the supplier had not paid duty or had made an incorrect declaration did not by itself justify denial. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and deemed Modvat credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 341 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31150</link>
      <description>Where a deemed Modvat credit notification required inputs to be received under invoices declaring payment of appropriate duty, the recipient was not burdened with proving actual duty discharge by the supplier unless the notification expressly imposed that requirement. The High Court followed its earlier view that receipt of inputs with the requisite invoice declaration satisfied the condition for credit, and a later allegation that the supplier had not paid duty or had made an incorrect declaration did not by itself justify denial. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and deemed Modvat credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>