<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1238 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305507</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court accepted the recommendations of the Central Empowered Committee, with certain clarifications, including exclusion of Paragraph (5) for Manganese ore leases and amendments in clause (ix). The previous order was extended to include Tumkur and Chitradurga districts, with a directive for a macro level EIA study and submission of a reclamation plan. The funding for the EIA study was directed to be covered under the ad-hoc CAMPA Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 11:07:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1238 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305507</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court accepted the recommendations of the Central Empowered Committee, with certain clarifications, including exclusion of Paragraph (5) for Manganese ore leases and amendments in clause (ix). The previous order was extended to include Tumkur and Chitradurga districts, with a directive for a macro level EIA study and submission of a reclamation plan. The funding for the EIA study was directed to be covered under the ad-hoc CAMPA Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>