<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1337 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305500</link>
    <description>A succession certificate obtained on prima facie misrepresentation and concealment of material facts can be corrected by directing re-deposit of the amount withdrawn on its strength. The HC found that the petitioner had represented herself as the deceased&#039;s sister in the succession proceedings and earlier revenue proceedings, and her later plea of being the deceased&#039;s wife&#039;s sister and an adoptee was not credible on the surrounding circumstances. The trial court was therefore justified in invoking inherent powers under Section 151 CPC, and the writ petition failed. The succession proceedings were left to be decided independently on merits under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 09:42:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1337 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305500</link>
      <description>A succession certificate obtained on prima facie misrepresentation and concealment of material facts can be corrected by directing re-deposit of the amount withdrawn on its strength. The HC found that the petitioner had represented herself as the deceased&#039;s sister in the succession proceedings and earlier revenue proceedings, and her later plea of being the deceased&#039;s wife&#039;s sister and an adoptee was not credible on the surrounding circumstances. The trial court was therefore justified in invoking inherent powers under Section 151 CPC, and the writ petition failed. The succession proceedings were left to be decided independently on merits under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>