<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 342 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431225</link>
    <description>Court ruled on a tax dispute involving IGST refund claims and Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules, 2017. The HC found the Petitioner&#039;s challenge premature due to ongoing investigations into manufacturing processes and input tax credit eligibility. The court disposed of the petition, allowing the Petitioner to pursue separate legal actions regarding specific tax authority instructions and refund withholding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 342 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431225</link>
      <description>Court ruled on a tax dispute involving IGST refund claims and Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules, 2017. The HC found the Petitioner&#039;s challenge premature due to ongoing investigations into manufacturing processes and input tax credit eligibility. The court disposed of the petition, allowing the Petitioner to pursue separate legal actions regarding specific tax authority instructions and refund withholding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>