<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1478 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305497</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the NCLT&#039;s order directing the inclusion of the leasehold rights in the Liquidation Estate, emphasizing the need for possession to maximize realization value. The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the inclusion of personal properties, stating the petitioners had an alternate remedy through appeal under the IBC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 21:08:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1478 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305497</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the NCLT&#039;s order directing the inclusion of the leasehold rights in the Liquidation Estate, emphasizing the need for possession to maximize realization value. The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the inclusion of personal properties, stating the petitioners had an alternate remedy through appeal under the IBC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>