<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1137 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It ruled that the assessee was eligible for additional depreciation on embroidery machines as the embroidery process resulted in a commercially different product. Additionally, the disallowance of 20% of certain expenses was deemed unwarranted as they were necessary for the business&#039;s day-to-day operations. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 11:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1137 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It ruled that the assessee was eligible for additional depreciation on embroidery machines as the embroidery process resulted in a commercially different product. Additionally, the disallowance of 20% of certain expenses was deemed unwarranted as they were necessary for the business&#039;s day-to-day operations. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>