<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 301 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal partly, holding the reassessment as null and void and deleting the addition made under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the issue of reopening the assessment was not adjudicated. The Tribunal ruled that the Assessee, not being a shareholder of the company, could not be taxed under the deemed dividend provisions. The order was pronounced on 22nd July 2022 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 301 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal partly, holding the reassessment as null and void and deleting the addition made under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the issue of reopening the assessment was not adjudicated. The Tribunal ruled that the Assessee, not being a shareholder of the company, could not be taxed under the deemed dividend provisions. The order was pronounced on 22nd July 2022 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>