<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 300 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431183</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging goods seizure under U.P.G.S.T. Act. Court held that petitioner&#039;s remedy lies in filing appeal under Section 107 against penalty order. Factual disputes regarding seizure and detention can be addressed through appellate mechanism, rendering writ petition unnecessary. Alternative remedy exists, thus petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 300 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431183</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging goods seizure under U.P.G.S.T. Act. Court held that petitioner&#039;s remedy lies in filing appeal under Section 107 against penalty order. Factual disputes regarding seizure and detention can be addressed through appellate mechanism, rendering writ petition unnecessary. Alternative remedy exists, thus petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>