<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 295 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431178</link>
    <description>Taxpayers challenged a refund claim rejection due to procedural irregularities. HC found that authorities failed to provide opportunity for hearing as mandated under Rule 92 of CGST Rules, 2017. The court quashed the order, directing authorities to follow proper procedure and reconsider the refund claim within 8 weeks, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 295 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431178</link>
      <description>Taxpayers challenged a refund claim rejection due to procedural irregularities. HC found that authorities failed to provide opportunity for hearing as mandated under Rule 92 of CGST Rules, 2017. The court quashed the order, directing authorities to follow proper procedure and reconsider the refund claim within 8 weeks, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>