<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 290 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the adjustment of sale proceeds of an immovable property by the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) was incorrect. The Tribunal held that the CPC&#039;s actions resulted in double taxation, as the sale proceeds were already disclosed under the capital gains head. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the erroneous adjustment, emphasizing the need to rectify the mistake apparent from the record. As a result, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 10:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 290 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the adjustment of sale proceeds of an immovable property by the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) was incorrect. The Tribunal held that the CPC&#039;s actions resulted in double taxation, as the sale proceeds were already disclosed under the capital gains head. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the erroneous adjustment, emphasizing the need to rectify the mistake apparent from the record. As a result, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>