<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31137</link>
    <description>SC held that ship-breaking constituted an industrial undertaking producing distinct articles, so deductions under Sections 80-HH and 80-I were allowable to the assessee. The court ruled the assessee was not obliged to deduct tax under Section 195(1) because, after insertion of Explanation-2 to Section 10(15)(iv)(c), the income was not assessable in India and TDS did not arise. Appeals by the assessee were allowed and the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31137</link>
      <description>SC held that ship-breaking constituted an industrial undertaking producing distinct articles, so deductions under Sections 80-HH and 80-I were allowable to the assessee. The court ruled the assessee was not obliged to deduct tax under Section 195(1) because, after insertion of Explanation-2 to Section 10(15)(iv)(c), the income was not assessable in India and TDS did not arise. Appeals by the assessee were allowed and the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>