<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 265 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431148</link>
    <description>The court upheld the rejection of the appellant&#039;s tax credit claim, stating that the consideration for the works contract was receivable upon the transfer of property in goods as indicated in the tax invoices. The court emphasized that the appellant&#039;s failure to claim tax credit during the relevant tax period justified the rejection, ruling in favor of the respondents/revenue and against the appellant/assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 10:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 265 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431148</link>
      <description>The court upheld the rejection of the appellant&#039;s tax credit claim, stating that the consideration for the works contract was receivable upon the transfer of property in goods as indicated in the tax invoices. The court emphasized that the appellant&#039;s failure to claim tax credit during the relevant tax period justified the rejection, ruling in favor of the respondents/revenue and against the appellant/assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>