https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305482 The court rejected the application for injunction seeking to restrain the company from discussing the agenda item related to property disposal at the Annual General Meeting. Instead, the court directed the company to invite tenders for the property after the resolution, allowing the applicants to participate in the process. The court emphasized that the directors would finalize the dealings based on the best offer received by the company, ensuring transparency in the property development process. en-us Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Dec 2022 18:20:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305482 The court rejected the application for injunction seeking to restrain the company from discussing the agenda item related to property disposal at the Annual General Meeting. Instead, the court directed the company to invite tenders for the property after the resolution, allowing the applicants to participate in the process. The court emphasized that the directors would finalize the dealings based on the best offer received by the company, ensuring transparency in the property development process. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305482