https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305474 A consent award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act could not be set aside on vague, belated allegations of coercion or fraud where no particulars or supporting material were pleaded. The record showed that the party's board had authorised execution of the consent terms and a request for an award on those terms, and no objection was raised for months after the award. Section 34(2)(b)(ii) and its Explanation were inapplicable because there was no fraud practised on the tribunal; the parties had knowingly sought the award. Disputes arising from a separate memorandum of understanding also could not affect the award, as that arrangement was not incorporated into or made conditional under the consent terms. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Dec 2022 14:39:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305474 A consent award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act could not be set aside on vague, belated allegations of coercion or fraud where no particulars or supporting material were pleaded. The record showed that the party's board had authorised execution of the consent terms and a request for an award on those terms, and no objection was raised for months after the award. Section 34(2)(b)(ii) and its Explanation were inapplicable because there was no fraud practised on the tribunal; the parties had knowingly sought the award. Disputes arising from a separate memorandum of understanding also could not affect the award, as that arrangement was not incorporated into or made conditional under the consent terms. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305474